The lesson plan that I decided to adapt for this
assignment is one that I used in my Methods for Teaching English class, which
is based on Kate Chopin’s “Story of an Hour.” It was designed for an eleventh
grade English class. With group collaboration and presentations included, it is
estimated to take approximated five forty-five minute class sessions.
As
a “Do Now,” I originally had my students write in their journals about their
thoughts to the ending to the short story. I had them write what they liked and
what they would change. This would prepare them to write an alternative ending
to the short story. I would then have the students briefly share their ideas with
the class and then introduce them to their writing assignment. In this adapted
lesson, I decided to maintain the same “Do Now” writing assignment; however,
instead of having the students share their ideas aloud, I saved that for later.
The students will discuss their ideas in groups, as discussed in the second row
of the matrix. As mentioned in the first row of the matrix, I have added the
use of a SmartBoard to demonstrate examples of what their final product should
look like. The students will listen and ask questions.
Originally,
I wanted my students to independently write an alternate ending to the short
story in an essay format. The students would be instructed to eliminate the
final two paragraphs of the short story and continue with their ideas from
there. In this new lesson, instead of having the students independently write
their alternative ending, I decided to allow my students to work in groups of
three to four to create a video of their alternative ending. Pedagogically, I
think that this would be a great way to incorporate technology because I am
providing students two different options; they can either record themselves
acting, or they can use a website, such as GoAnimate, to create a virtual
video. This way, students who do not feel comfortable with filming themselves
have an alternative method of completing the assignment. As mentioned in the
second row, the students will communicate and collaborate in groups. Those
filming themselves can use any of the following technologies: cameras, cell
phones, iPads, and/or laptops with webcams. The students who are virtually
creating a video will use a computer to access GoAnimate. Unlike the original
lesson, this one is engaging for students because they get to use technologies
that they use in their everyday lives in a school setting. Also, these
technologies are easy to carry from home to school.
In
the third row, I mention that students will present their videos to the class
using the SmartBoard. In the original plan, I had the students share their
alternate endings in groups, not with the entire class. The students presenting
will then engage the audience in a discussion about their thinking process and
what led them to believe that this was a reasonable ending based on textual
evidence. Pedagogically, I find this to be both an engaging and educational
assignment, because in order for the students to create an alternative ending,
the goal is that they will understand the conflict, characters, setting, and writing style.
As
mentioned in the fourth row, the students in the audience will evaluate the
group presenting using a rubric, which was created on Rubistar in a previous
class session. The students will have this rubric printed out for when each
group presents. The rubric will have a section to evaluate both the video and
the explanation of the video.
I
particularly like the idea of students sharing their work with one another;
that is why I decided to make it mandatory that all students post their video
up on DropBox, as seen in row five. As the teacher, I will create a DropBox folder and allow all my
students to have access to it. This way students can access each others’ videos
whenever they please; this will particularly benefit those students who are
absent. To do this, the best option is to use a computer to download the video
file; however, the students can access each others’ work through their iPads
and Smartphones.
Overall,
I feel as if this adapted lesson will pedagogically benefit all the students in
my class, because they will bring their technologies into a classroom setting,
students will collaborate with peers, they will develop stronger public speaking
skills through presentation, and students will take on the role of a teacher by
evaluating groups with a rubric.
My Matrix!
Michelle, both your matrix and narrative are very detailed and comprehensive. You did an excellent job in the narrative above of making your pedagogical moves both clear and intentional, as well as making a logical argument for your uses of technology.
ReplyDeleteI just have one clarification regarding your matrix, and this is simply because I did not emphasize the media literacy cycle during the semester; nevertheless, it's important to clarify that the cycle is progressive in the order of: access, analyze, evaluate, produce and communicate. In other words, students communicate about what they produce, and produce (using media and technology), based on the information they access, analyze and evaluate. The cycle can occur multiple times throughout a lesson, but the cycle occurs in that order.